"The longer I live, the more I realize the impact of attitude on life. Attitude, to me, is more important than facts. It is more important than the past, than education, than money, than circumstances, than failures, than successes, than what other people think or say or do. It is more important than appearance, giftedness or skill. It will make or break a company…a church…a home. The remarkable thing is we have a choice every day regarding the attitude we will embrace for that day. We cannot change our past. We cannot change the inevitable. The only thing we can do is play on the one string we have, and that is our attitude…I am convinced that life is 10% what happens to me and 90% how I react to it. And so it is with you…Interestingly, many people don't seem to understand that the one thing over which they do have control is their attitude and the way the feel. I remember numerous times one of my children would complain about how I made them mad. I tried to teach her that it wasn't me but that she was in control of such emotions, that she aloud something I did to upset her. I don't know if she ever understood.
we are in charge of our Attitudes." ~ Charles Swindoll
Friday, June 10, 2005
Monday, May 23, 2005
According to a story at CNN.com, there is a good possibility that people will be able to download their brain to a supercomputer in the near future.
"If you're rich enough then by 2050 it's feasible. If you're poor you'll probably have to wait until 2075 or 2080 when it's routine," he said.An interesting concept but I am left to wonder about what the purpose of such a thing might be. Honestly, are we going to have a real purpose behind this? We are cautioned to back up the data on our computers in case there are problems making it necessary to reformat. Am I to believe that once we've downloaded our brains, we have some kind of safeguard against braindamage?
This is a realm of science fiction that we've yet to touch the surface in real life. I don't know many people that are willing to plug their cranium into a computer or other such device.
Thursday, May 12, 2005
I do not consider myself a Hepburn fan but I've enjoyed many of her movies.
Wednesday, May 11, 2005
A Pembroke Welsh Corgi, she has very short legs and no tail and is a very docile creature.
Tuesday, May 10, 2005
Packing fruit in the goves, circa 1880.
Downtown Placentia is probably the only place that hasn't changed much since my childhood. Many of the buildings have been refurbished but they look very much the same as they did so many years ago.
The La Imperial Ranch Market on the corner of Bradford and Santa Fe.
The Tlaquepaque Restaurant and Placentia Bakery at the corner of Bradford and Santa Fe.
I don't get to go home often but when I do, these are some of the places I'm sure to visit.
He has determined that they cannot afford two lawers so his wife is going to have a lawyer and he will represent himself. Oh, I hope I can convince him to do different.
Thursday, May 05, 2005
Today is the anniversary of Søren Kierkegaard's birth. He was born May 5, 1813. Mr. Kierkegaard argued that actual life cannot be contained within an abstract conceptual system. He hoped to open the way for an adequate consideration of faith. He argued that there existed a gulf between God and man that faith alone can bridge.
Wednesday, May 04, 2005
Your Existing Situation
Readily participates in things that provide excitement or stimulation. Wants to feel exhilarated.
Your Stress Sources
The existing situation is disagreeable. Feels lonely and uncertain as he has an unsatisfied need to ally himself with others whose standards are as high as his own, and wants to stand out from the rank and file. This sense of isolation magnifies the need into a compelling urge, all the more upsetting to his self-sufficiency because of the restraint he normally imposes on himself. Since he wants to demonstrate the unique quality of his own character, he tries to suppress this need for others and affects an attitude of unconcerned self-reliance to conceal his fear of inadequacy, treating those who criticize his behavior with contempt. However, beneath this assumption of indifference he really longs for the approval and esteem of others.
Your Restrained Characteristics
Willing to participate and to allow himself to become involved, but tries to fend off conflict and disturbance in order to reduce tension.
Circumstances are forcing him to compromise, to restrain his demands and hopes, and to forgo for the time being some of the things he wants.
Your Desired Objective
Desires a tranquil, peaceful state of harmony offering quiet contentment and a sense of belonging.
Your Actual Problem
Disappointment at the non-fulfillment of his hopes and the fear that to formulate fresh goals will only lead to further setbacks have resulted in considerable anxiety. He is trying to escape from this into a peaceful and harmonious relationship, protecting him from dissatisfaction and lack of appreciation.
Your Actual Problem #2
Wants to be valued and respected, and seeks this from a close and peaceful association of mutual esteem.
I cannot say how accurate this might be. Many times tests that seem to provide insight are simply so broad in their statements that anyone can pick out what they like while ignoring those areas with which they disagree.
An interesting experience in any rate, I would suggest that you read all the instructions and follow them carefully. Although the test hasn't any difficult questions there is one point where you are asked to wait for the timer to count down to zero. I almost didn't see this.
Tuesday, May 03, 2005
Wrong side of the bedSometimes I wonder if I would have been better off staying put. I know better though. Life is a wonderful experience and I'll never feel the wonders of existence peeking at the world from under my duvet.
Raining on my parade
A week full of Mondays
Singing the blues
Wrong side of the bed
Too much to do and
Too little time for it
Nothing going right
Wrong side of the bed
The mirror broken
By an ink black cat
Walking under a ladder
Wrong side of the bed
Nothing to do but
Crawl back in
And try again
© 2004, by Joseph Rohrbach
When I born, I black,I think it is interesting that human nature tends toward labels. We label everyone with whom we come into contact. Not all these labels are without merit but most have no basis in reality. Instead our prejudices have a firm foundation in ignorance. It is only by overcoming our ignorance that we realize just how unmerited our impressions might have been.
When I grow up, I black,
When I go in sun, I black,
When I cold, I black,
When I scared, I black,
When I sick, I black,
When I bruise, I black,
And when I die, I still black,
You white folks....
When you born, you PINK,
When you grow up, you WHITE,
When you go in sun, you RED,
When you cold, you BLUE,
When you scared, you YELLOW,
When you sick, you GREEN,
When you bruised, you PURPLE,
And when you die, you GRAY
So who you calling COLORED?
Are we not all brothers and sisters?
Thursday, April 28, 2005
Iron Man Wang, Government Propaganda Poster
"It's absurd," Zhou Xiaozheng, a sociologist at People's University in Beijing, said of Yao's award. "Model workers should be ordinary people you can look up to and imitate. Yao Ming is an NBA star. That's honor enough. Besides, what he does, it's impossible for ordinary people to imitate."Whether Yao Ming is the right man for the Communist Party's exemplar I cannot say. However, this brings to mind something that has concerned me for some time. The people we choose to be our heroes have changed over the years. Not so many years ago when you asked a child who his hero might be, the answer would most likely be an astronaut or, maybe even closer to home, a policeman or fireman. Today's children are far more likely to pick a sports or music star as their role model. Although many of today’s sports stars are good people, the lives they lead aren’t those to which ordinary people might aspire. Honestly, I want the world for my daughters but I’d rather they didn’t follow in the footsteps of most of today’s pop culture icons.
I wonder, what has changed that has caused the world's focus to move from those who are good examples of honest, hard work and/or learning to those who have been successful winning life's popularity contests.
Tuesday, April 26, 2005
Of course, it was probably right after they dove 30 feet below the surface of the ocean, struggled to pry it off the rocks, and barely made it to the surface without drowning. The first thought was probably something more akin to, “I don’t care that it looks like elephant snot, I went through all that for this, I’m going to eat it.”
I wonder how many of our common dishes can be traced to an event where it was eat this or die from hunger.
Monday, April 25, 2005
Past the seeker as he prayed came the crippled and the beggar and the beaten. And seeing them... he cried, "Great God, how is it that a loving creator can see such things and yet do nothing about them?" God said, "I did do something. I made you." ~ Author UnknownGod gave us more opportunities than anyone could use in many lifetimes. We must look around ourselves and take that opportunity to help and lift our fellow man!
Sunday, April 24, 2005
- You have a bag that is 45cm long, 18cm wide and 30cm high. If you put them in carefully one at a time, how many standard paperback books can you place in the empty bag?
- Why is it that a man living in Oxford can never be buried in Cambridge?
- Name four things that you cannot eat for breakfast.
- Even if you have never been to France you should be able to say what’s in the centre of Paris.
- 2 fathers and 2 sons go fishing. Each caught a fish but they only landed 3. How come?
- Heres a list of 4 words with something in common: ATOM TIMID LESSON HANDY could WILLOW join the list?
- How come Englishmen use more soap than Irishmen without being noticeably cleaner?
- To everyone’s amazement a swan was seen on the Mekong River. Where had it come from?
- What do the following animals all have in common: Bombay Duck, White Elephant, Guinea Pig, Silk Worm, Firefly?
- What’s so fragile that you break it just by naming it?
Thursday, April 21, 2005
Honestly, remember how the world responded to the tsunami in South East Asia with great speed and compassion. That, my friends, was a high point, something on which I could hang my cares and considerations – my faith in humanity. I worried that the world community might not have the stamina to apply to this great disaster but it seems that much of my worries were without cause. Sure, there is plenty of work still to be done but the world has not forgotten their less fortunate brothers, at least not in that part of the world.
What, then, can we say about those others of our brethren that are afflicted with strife? How is it that we can pat ourselves on the back with great enthusiasm when there is so much suffering in other parts of the world? The wickedness that men afflict on each other is enough to cause great pains and concern for anyone who takes a moment to look around. The Sudan, just one example of the terrible things humanity inflicts on itself. This is not nature or natural. One man kills another because of religion or race – everyone should be disturbed and revolted. This, however, is not just one man and they aren’t just killing each other. The terrible acts – oh, so terrible! Governments of the world should not stand for such indiscretions.
Why was the world so quick to offer aid when the tsunami visited such terrible destruction yet we cannot find it in our collective consciousness to act when men violate the rights of other men?
Wednesday, April 20, 2005
Then I worked in the woods as a lumberjack, but I just couldn't hack it, so they gave me the axe.
After that I tried to be a tailor, but I just wasn't suited for it, mainly because it was a so-so job.
Next I tried working in a muffler factory but that was too exhausting.
Then I tried to be a chef, figured it would add a little spice to my life, but I just didn't have the thyme.
I attempted to be a deli worker, but anyway I sliced it, I couldn't cut the mustard.
My best job was being a musician, but eventually I found I wasn't noteworthy.
I studied a long time to become a doctor, but I didn't have any patience.
Next was a job in a shoe factory; I tried but I just didn't fit in.
I became a professional fisherman, but discovered that I couldn't live on my net income.
I managed to get a good job working for a pool maintenance company, but the work was just too draining.
So then I got a job in a workout center, but they said I wasn't fit for the job.
After many years of trying to find steady work, I finally got a job as an historian, until I realized there was no future in it.
My last job was working at Starbucks, but I had to quit because it was always the same old grind.
SO I RETIRED AND I FOUND I'M PERFECT FOR THE JOB
Tuesday, April 19, 2005
U.S. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema in Alexandria is scheduled to meet with Moussaoui this week to determine if he has the mental capacity to enter a plea now, the sources said. — Jerry Markon, Washington Post Staff WriterNot to defend the man that may have been the very center of what has become the most devastating attack on U.S. soil but how can anyone be considered sane after initiating such destruction? No, I'm not saying Moussaoui cannot be held responsible. Nor am I suggesting that because of this lack of sanity, the sentence should be anything less. I guess what troubles me is this. If you are going to insist on a certain punishment for a crime, does one's sanity really come into play?
Monday, April 18, 2005
Thank you for your message regarding the need to protect civil liberties in the midst of the fight against terrorism. I appreciate learning your thoughts about this issue.
I understand your concerns about measures that expand the authority of law enforcement, such as the Patriot Act and the National Security Intelligence Reform Act. I am committed to preserving our freedoms during war and peace. We cannot forget the lessons painfully learned from times when we sacrificed liberty in the name of security.
Congress responded promptly to the attacks on September 11th by crafting bipartisan anti-terrorism legislation called the USA Patriot Act. I supported the Patriot Act because it addressed gaps in our laws that have unnecessarily hindered law enforcement efforts against terrorists and other criminals – for example, it updated some wiretap and electronic surveillance laws that had been unchanged since the era of rotary telephones.
I recognize that the Patriot Act is far from perfect. Senator Larry Craig and I introduced the Security and Freedom Ensured (SAFE) Act to narrow its scope. This legislation would impose reasonable limits on law enforcement's authority to combat terrorism while protecting against unchecked government surveillance.
The measure does not repeal the Patriot Act, but rather makes necessary changes to it. For instance, the SAFE Act would impose reasonable limits on the FBI's authority to seize business and library records, "sneak and peak" warrants, and roving wiretaps. The FBI would still have wide-ranging authority to combat terrorism while also protecting innocent Americans from unchecked government surveillance.
The Administration continues to take steps to expand, rather than restrict, the Patriot Act. Language drafted by the Justice Department and known as Patriot Act II or the Domestic Security Enhancement Act, contains provisions that would, among other things, go beyond prosecuting terrorist acts and take the extraordinary step of empowering the government to strip U.S. citizenship from individuals who engage in lawful activities that may be seen by our government as supporting "terrorist" organizations. In addition, the proposal would create a DNA database of "suspected terrorists," mandate that arrests in cases of international terrorism be kept secret until an indictment is filed, and empower the Attorney General to deport lawful permanent U.S. residents if he believes their presence is inconsistent with our national security. While the draft has not been introduced in Congress as a bill in its entirety, portions have been proposed.
In addition, some of the provisions from the draft Patriot Act II were added to the National Security Intelligence Reform Act last year. I opposed the inclusion of these provisions and worked to include language to limit the likelihood of civil liberties violations. I am pleased that the final version of that bill included core elements of my proposal to create an independent board tasked with ensuring that the government does not violate privacy or civil liberties.
I am committed to defending our country while protecting our civil liberties and our principles of freedom and justice. As Congress revisits this issue and considers additional anti-terrorism legislation, we must take care to preserve these important ideals. Thanks again for your message.
Richard J. Durbin
United States Senator
P.S. If you are ever visiting Washington, please feel free to join Senator Obama and me at our weekly constituent coffee. When the Senate is in session, we provide coffee and donuts every Thursday at 8:30 a.m. as we hear what is on the minds of Illinoisans and respond to your questions. We would welcome your participation. Please call my D.C. office for more details.
I am happy to hear from the my senator regarding my concerns about the powers given to our government through the patriot act and other congressional efforts that have precipitated out of the terror attacts of September 11, 2001.
All Americans should understand the serious nature of these things and insist that their legislators work to protect our rights.
Wednesday, April 13, 2005
"I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it." — Thomas Jefferson to Archibald Stuart, 1791.The most incredulous arguments for the passage of the Patriot Act pertain to these things. More specifically, arguing that we should be willing to give up certain rights in an effort to gain certain safety.
"They that can give up Essential Liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." — Benjamin Franklin
All Americans should be concerned about the rights we have resigned through the passage of this Act of Congress. Each of us should be concerned enough to contact our Senator/Congressman and let them know that we cannot stand for the cause that supports the Patriot Act.
No, our government is not currently a tyranny but there is precious little preventing it from becoming such.
“As nightfall does not come at once, neither does oppression. In both instances there is a twilight where everything remains seemingly unchanged, and it is in such twilight that we must be aware of the change in the air, however slight, lest we become unwitting victims of the darkness.” — Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas
MOST OF ALL,
MONETARY AID TO THEIR KIDS!
Tuesday, April 12, 2005
Today, while I was reading through the internet about various and sundry topics a certain headline caught my attention. Now, the story itself was a short one but the headline seemed to be of greater importance than the author or editor seemed to believe. The headline read Islamic relations key Vatican topic. I wonder, really, how much import can one religion place on the position of another when selecting a leader. If you do believe, indeed, that this man is in a position closest to God, who are we to dictate to him?
I guess that two of the forerunners in the contest for pope - if you wish to call it a contest - have differing views on how the church's position on Islam should be.
Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the Vatican's doctrinal enforcer, is believed to favor evangelization of Muslims, while Cardinal Angelo Scola, the archbishop of Venice, is believed to favor conciliation and dialogue. Both men are viewed as papal contenders.Though I am not certain that evangelization is the appropriate position to take toward any other religious group, I am still left to my quandry. Does a man have a right to dictate to God how His Church should treat others?
Friday, April 08, 2005
As reported in the BBC News, a Chinese man stabbed and killed another Shanghai gamer for a virtual sword in the game Legends of Mir 3. The sword, a dragon saber, is one of the more powerful weapons available in the game. Also, according to the news story, China does not have laws governing the sale of or protecting the possession of virtual property. On the other hand, Korea does. This is news to me – how can you govern this stuff?
Blizzard takes a dim view of people selling items from World of Warcraft for real cash – it is punishable by deletion of the player’s account under the terms and conditions of the EULA. Though Blizzard are probably the most militant of the MMORPG providers, some games not only allow the sale of items for real cash, but actively encourage it. There even gaming stock exchanges that allow you to trade virtual currencies from the games for real cash.
This story is quite shocking to me but I guess if a kid will kill another for his shoes, I should not be too surprised when such actions are taken for virtual property as well.
Thursday, April 07, 2005
"This is the new Iraq," said Hachim Hassani, the assembly's recently elected speaker, "where a Kurdish citizen is elected president of the country and a sitting Arab president will become his deputy. What more could the world want from us?" — Edmund Sanders, Times Staff Writer
Well, many people are looking at these events and thinking that we've begun down the road to Iraqi democracy. Others are thinking that it can never happen and that we need to pull out and leave Iraq to the whims of those left behind. How long has it been since we invaded Iraq and deposed their dictator? Two years + a couple weeks hasn't been long enough to provide the new government the foundation necessary.
I agree with those who do not want our troops in harms way. I agree with those who want our troops to come home. On the other hand, I want the Iraqi people to have every opportunity to have the freedoms I enjoy. I think if we look at history to see how long it takes to build a stable democracy, the perspective might provide some relief for those who consider two years too long.
After winning the Independence War, how long did it take to elect George Washington as the United States' "first" president? Although I do not remember covering this in my U.S. History classes, I'll give most the benefit of the doubt. The following review will be solely for my benefit.
The Declaration of Independence was signed by John Hancock on July 4, 1776 - the others followed suite in August of that same year. Amidst military mayhem (the loss of the Southern States to the British, former Continental Congress President Henry Middleton swearing his allegiance to the King, and Benedict Arnold burning Richmond after accepting a general’s commission in the British Army) the States managed to rally and finally ratify the first constitution in 1781 – The Articles of Confederation. The United States was established as a Perpetual Union just in time as our friends and foes alike accepted the unanimously ratified Articles of Confederation as evidence of one united country. Almost immediately France threw her military might behind General Washington enabling the decisive Victory at Yorktown. The United States had won the war but stability would not be hers, not yet.
In 1781, despite winning Independence militarily, we had an almost helpless unicameral (single branch) government that nearly failed to administer the governmental affairs of the United States. The monetary system nearly collapsed and by the summer of 1783 Pennsylvania Soldiers mutinied holding the entire United States in Congress Assembled its president Elias Boudinot hostage in Independence Hall. President Arthur St. Clair and Col. Alexander Hamilton worked together to get the mutineers to back down and the released congress fled, reconvening in Princeton where they were protected by the New Jersey militia.
Widespread injustices penetrated the courts, taxes, voting and intrastate duties and laws through 1786. Most considered dissolving the Perpetual Union of the United States of America. In 1786, the Annapolis Convention to revise the Articles of Confederation collapsed and a citizen insurgence known as Shays’ Rebellion flared up. Shays’ Rebellion was not put down until March 1787.
The military provided the protection the United States in Congress Assembled needed to gather and revise the Articles of Confederation in Philadelphia in May 1787. This time, George Washington accepted the Presidency of the Constitutional Convention. That convention produced an entirely new plan for the Federal Government – The United States Constitution. This new government was finally established in 1789 a full thirteen years after independence was declared in 1776.
Considering our own history, most people are expecting significantly more from Afghanistan and Iraq than what our forefathers accomplished. I think we need to continue to help these young governments grow and strengthen without losing hope or sight of the great cause for which they are struggling. Bring our troops home but not before it is time and these new governments can support themselves.
Wednesday, April 06, 2005
“If the current lineup [of games] in development for the next-generation Xbox was revealed,” Okamoto said in the interview, “it would not only surprise users, but the entire industry. There probably wouldn’t be anyone [in Japan] that would still be uninterested in buying the next-generation Xbox when they see the lineup.” He called the still-under-wraps list “a powerful fleet of Japanese designers” — Hirohiko Niizumi @ GameSpot, 04/04/05 06:34 PM PST
Japan has always remained a very difficult market for Microsoft’s Xbox to penetrate. It looks like Microsoft is trying to do something that will ensure their success in the world’s largest electronic entertainment market – only time will tell whether the strategy will work.
I must admit that I've been a fan of the Xbox for some time and am looking forward to the work for which these developers show promise.
Monday, April 04, 2005
It made me wonder, to what point are we allowed to react violently without having to accept the consequences for our actions. The report describes how many of the protestors found themselves wounded and that they were physically forced out of the Petroleum Exchange but says nothing about what might have happened to those who applied the force.
Even in circumstances as these, those who responded to the protest with violence should have to stand and be accountable.
Friday, April 01, 2005
Thursday, March 31, 2005
Two little old ladies were attending a rather long service at their church. One leaned over and whispered, "My butt is going to sleep." Her friend leaned over and said, "I know. I heard it snore three times."
So, the day begins with a little laughter and at whose expense? Some poor little lady who has the winds something fierce and doesn't seem to realize it. This is, however, humor and not gossip because it isn't a true story about someone. Harmless in everyway and completely inoccuous. Gossip on the other hand may seem harmless but to the contrary may be very damaging.
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.Eleanor Roosevelt seems to have been a very wise woman. Much of what we attribute to her makes heaps plenty sense. I have found these words echoing in my head in many instances when a conversation degrades and turns to a discussion about another person.
Wednesday, March 30, 2005
“The consequences of humans’ activities are severe and include: new diseases, sudden changes in water quality, creation of “dead zones” along the coasts, the collapse of fisheries, and shifts in regional climate, according to the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis Report.” - CTV.ca News StaffI'm not a tree-hugging environmentalist. In fact, I'm probably one of those guys that environmentalists consider the enemy. This, however, is quite disturbing.
So much in our world we take for granted. So much could be different if the goals and purposes we set to were less selfish and more altruistic. Seriously, our species is doomed to fail unless more people consider the bigger picture.
Monday, March 28, 2005
Apparently, I don’t seem to understand the manner in which the constitution provides for checks and balances between the different branches of the government, nor do I understand the rights of states to govern. The actions of the House of Representative, the Republican Party in particular, has left me awe-struck!
As a life-long Republican, I cannot remember when I’ve felt such betrayal or when I’ve sided with the Democrats on an issue. We preach small federal government. We believe in states’ rights. We complain about how the Democratic Party wishes to meddle too much in the daily affairs of the people, yet here we are making a local issue, which should be settled by local courts, a national issue. Not only did congress usurp the constitutional powers of the judiciary branch but they also trampled the rights of the states to govern.
Why did the Republican Party have to take this action? The political gain in Florida certainly cannot outweigh the long-term consequences.
I am appalled.