Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Obama: The Feel Good Brand

It’s been a couple weeks since the election and I’ve had some time to think about it. I am not worried that the American voters made a big mistake. It’s great that a black man can be elected President in America. It does not, however, come close to making up for the great national sin of slavery, does it? Martin Luther King exclaimed that he dreamed of an America where a man could be judged for the content of his character and not the color of his skin. But it looks like most black people voted for Obama because he’s black, not because of what he believes. No, this does not bother me a whole lot by its own merit. It may be a good thing that 12% of the American population woke up and for the first time felt like they belonged to an America where anything really is possible. That is great.

It is pretty sad that a significant segment of the American population has struggled to identifying with their country for so many generations. I wonder, though, if people are any more proud of America than they were before. If people are proud of America for seeing past race, America could justifiably be proud for surprising the world again. But as far as I can tell, people are more proud of Obama than they are for America.

This actually reduces what this election was all about to something less than it otherwise could have been. This election was not about the deficit, global warming, or the neo-cons. It was about a vote people could make to feel better about themselves. Obama offered people that chance. The Republicans got exactly what they deserved for betraying small-government, fiscally-conservative, sound-money and non-interventionist foreign policy principles. They also underestimated how badly people want to believe in something. This election was about feelings not reasoning - Pathos not Logos.

The campaign season started out all right. In fact, there were a few times when I thought it would begin to take off and really become something. It never did. It was not a campaign at all. In most cases, we were subjected to nothing more Barack Obama’s personal history, two years of reality television very well produced and edited. In fact, once Barack Obama convinced America that his story was their story, there was only one way for the election to end. America loves a winner.

Many in the media and even political pundits have compared the Obamas to the Kennedys. I sincerely struggle to even understand what that is supposed to mean. Race still matters in America just like religion still matters. I was beside myself when people would claim Barack Obama was a Muslim as if that were a bad thing. The Obama campaign made it even worse by denying he was a Muslim, as if being a Muslim were a bad thing. Being very touchy on the subject of race, segments of the public turned to religion – a religion that has been rather unpopular in America since the terrorist attacks in September 2001. Anyway, the things that make us different actually tend to make us a stronger society.

People who claim the Obama Whitehouse is the next Kennedy Whitehouse seem to be grasping at romance and nostalgia. These are people who have always wanted to believe that a dynamic leader could take us toward better, more enlightened government. These people are crazy hungry for something that seems to be missing from their lives. They seem to be living their fantasies vicariously through Obama’s life. It is human nature to want to be part of something greater than oneself. The fervor felt by many, however, tends to drive people to do stupid things like burning books or drinking kool-aid.

This election was not about something transcendent like civil-rights, it was a synthetic election. The power of America’s mass media and the entertainment image-making machine harnessed itself to a candidate for national office. Barack became the feel-good brand. He would magically repair America’s damaged worldwide reputation and fix our economy. Seriously, the Obama brand has the depth and staying power of a catchy pop tune. Very much like Dr Pepper, all sugar and caffeine rush but zero nutritional value. You’ll feel better for drinking it but you’re not getting any healthier.

I don’t think Barack Obama was any worse in this aspect than John McCain. Neither campaign had enough substance to support a feather, let alone the lead weight of the economic crisis or world-wide terrorism.

Modern politics is about the manipulation of the people’s emotions. We were barraged by fear, hope, anger and envy. Each campaign founded themselves on these emotions. They used words, images and really compelling but very likely false promises. The Obama Campaign was a masterpiece in manipulation. His was a triumph of style over content. John McCain’s campaign just could not find a big enough line onto which they could latch strong. Certainly, Barack Obama represents the triumph of the cult of personality over substance in American politics. Seriously, anytime people have faith in a man that exceeds their faith in ideas, it’s dangerous. We’re a nation of laws. Ideas should command loyalty. Equality before the law, freedom of speech, a right to own property. These are ideas on which we can hang our hopes. These are the ideas to which we should be loyal.

I might be sounding a bit sore – like a child who has a problem dealing with rejection. Much to the contrary, I am very used to losing. I lose all the time. I’m pretty used to it. It seems, though, that the high voter turnout was a disaster for people who love liberty. Some have argued that high voter turnout ensures better results or better government. Generally, high voter turnout is only a triumph for State power. It means that people who believe the government should have a great role in your life have succeeded in politicizing ever greater aspects of private life. Every problem becomes political. Every solution requires a new law. This election made one thing clear: Americans tend to believe in big government power, they just disagree about whom it should be directed against.

Why do people have so much secular faith in politics and in ‘transcendent’ men like Obama? It seems this trend has coincided with a loss of faith in the institutions which used to give life meaning and purpose. Things like family, community, the local school or the local church have been marginalized. We’ve become less about the local and more about the federal. Big government has become the mediator in a world that has become ever smaller, pushing out the local relationships. People have used the government to enforce their moral outlook on the world, the entire world. Once life used to be about the community. How many of us even know our neighbors anymore?

People are actively seeking a way to bring meaning to their lives. Viktor Frankl, a Holocaust survivor, says men can find meaning in their lives in three ways. First, through work that matters. Second, through relationships with other people. Third, through the attitude which we choose to have when we encounter the suffering life inevitably throws our way. Today’s America is largely made up of people who are alienated from their work, they see it as merely a vehicle to pay off their mortgage. The trend has been for us to recognize our work as less than the work we want to do with our lives. Most of us do not find meaning in our work. We labor, sweat, but gain no fruit.

The family has also been marginalized, reduced importance due to too much time looking at the television, e-mailing and texting constantly. We’re completely free to pursue our individual goals and desires and selfish pursuits. We have more ways than ever to communicate but we find ourselves alone more than ever.

Church and community have suffered in much the same way as the family but on a much grander scale. We moved from the mid-west to the west coast. The biggest shock to the family was the lack of community even among members of our congregation.

Most Americans don’t suffer anymore. We were born into a world of plenty. Plenty of energy, plenty of credit, plenty of food, plenty of surplus. Suffering in the modern world has no redeeming value – no value at all. When we do suffer it is a self-imposed torture of sorts. We voluntarily go to the gym, we commute through harsh traffic, we suffer through work. Superficial suffering. These aren’t in the service of any worthwhile purpose. They do nothing to give our lives meaning.

Barack Obama gave people something to which they could tie their wagon, gave them something to make them feel like their lives had meaning by voting for him. I don’t really understand how he pulled it off. I did see this, though, on the news when the media would show his rallies. People used to find meaning in the day-to-day relationship. Family, friends, neighbors. The cult of individual materialism and the Nanny State paternalism has made the relationship between a man and his government more important than any of these. This is rather depressing.

I fear people are going to ultimately be disappointed. Some may even be devastated. Political rhetoric can make you feel good for a while, something like that feeling we get when our sports team wins the championship. The sun always rises the next day and life remains the same as it did before – all the challenges, fears, hopes and opportunities are still the same. Mr. President-elect cannot live life for us. He cannot pay our mortgage, fuel our cars, make our jobs gain meaning they didn’t already have. He cannot fix our love-lives or our other relationships. Life is still the same as it was before the election. Seriously, wherever we go, there we’ll be.

So, the President-elect has a big job ahead of him. The task ahead of him may be greater than the man. In fact, I think it is probably greater than any man. John McCain and his team would be in the same boat but would not be burdened with the extreme expectations that accompany Barack Obama. My good wishes are with our President-elect. God’s speed.

9 comments:

Craig F said...

I disagree with you on so many different levels, on so many different points, I don't even know where to begin...

necrodancer said...

It's best to begin where you are and proceed step by step. Obviously, this was not a ten sentence post. It was intended to provoke. I hope my intent was fully realized.

Craig F said...

It was indeed realized. However, there's just too much. I think, though, it basically boils down to the fact that it appears as if you have a much darker, more cynical view of the political process and the electorate. I thought I was hard on the voting public, having lived through Illinois elections my whole life. But I think you've trumped me, and even if I proceed point by point for pages and pages, it's doubtful that I could address what appears to be at the core of your beliefs.

necrodancer said...

My feelings - feelings, you can't argue feelings. Give me logic, give me facts, those can be debated.

Anyway, my feelings about the political process and the electorate boils down to this. Most people do not care enough to research. Most people do not care enough to know more than what is placed before them on a golden tray. Most people do not care enough to know what they believe. Since they don't know what they believe, they will never know if the candidate shares the same beliefs. They do not, however, care to even know.

Most people aren't happy with their work and they find no meaningful relationships in their community - whether that community is their family, their congregation or the schools their kids are attending. Since their life is bereft of any real meaning outside their own little box, they aren't really happy.

Most people do not realize the depths to which they have descended. Since they aren't aware of the cause of their drift - they drift in life without any hold on a greater cause - they ultimately feel as though there should be more and are unhappy because they don't know the reasons for their unhappy state.

I'd suggest the electorate who placed a vote for Barack Obama could be divided into three broad categories. First, those of liberal mind who truly believe Barack Obama will lead the nation in embracing the tenants on which a better government will be established. Second, those who recognize Barack Obama's policies as flawed but believe them to be superior to what John McCain had to offer. Third, those people voting for nothing more than the symbol that was Barack Obama.

I would suggest most of those who voted for Barack Obama would not be capable of describing any of the policies Barack Obama embraced. Additionally, they would be hard pressed to describe how Barack Obama's policies are superior to those stated by the opposing party. The largest block of voters simply cast a ballot for change, not knowing exactly what that meant.

Barack Obama's campaign was certainly masterful, using all forms of the media to more fully establish an image the largest segment of voters could embrace. At the end of the day, people felt good for the first time because they voted for Barack Obama's transcendence not for any substance he may or may not have brought to the office.

reb said...

"Most people do not care enough to research...Most people do not care enough to know what they believe. Since they don't know what they believe, they will never know if the candidate shares the same beliefs. They do not, however, care to even know."

I would tend to disagree with this statement. With voting becoming "cool" and record numbers turning out to vote, I personally know very few people who do not at least have some grasp on canidates and policies. Not all are poli-sci majors but many are some shade of gray when it comes to politcal activism. Voting is becoming more chic now than it has been in a long time.

I think that is where the true problem lies. People think if they find a canidate that "believes" as they do then they will have a proxy voice in what happens in government. Anyone who is familiar with our government will tell you that is a hoax. The people have no voice in government other than who the bus driver will be, but it doesn't matter who drives the bus, it is on the same road, headed towards the same destination.

Anonymous said...

Like it or not, Barrack Obama is the presidential election results in a democracy system. The burden is very large, exceeding John McCain if he becomes president or president of the United States and other previously.
If Obama fails, it will be more difficult to other black president candidate becoming the next president of the United States. So, the future of the United States and even the world begins at this moment.

necrodancer said...

Pallas, Although voting became quite vogue this year, fewer people actually seemed to take the time necessary to research the candidates. In an informal poll, I asked many of the Barack Obama supporters in my office and among my vendors what policies Barack Obama supported that made them decide he was the best option. Of the 30 people with whom I spoke, only 8 could express more substantial reasoning beyond "change" and "hope". 22 people were simply transfixed by the image that was Barack Obama. Anecdotal at best, it was still surprising to me.

Aimyaya, I'm not certain we need to worry about the President-elects chances of hurting the black community or increasing problems with the racial divide. I don't think it is an issue except on the very fringe of the electorate. I think this was pretty well proven on November 4.

Please do not conclude from any remarks on this blog that I am rejecting the numbers or that I reject Barack Obama as our next POTUS. His was a decisive victory. I am very hopeful that Barack Obama successfully addresses the big issues our country faces. HOPE is very much a big part of my emotional make-up. . . I don't know, though, if it is strong enough to overwhelm the pessimism that has haunted me since the collapse of the financial markets and the manner in which the government has chosen to react.

Anonymous said...

Frankly I think you are generalizing just a tad. Yes, I am sure some people voted for Obama based on a perceived emotional connection. That's true of all campaigns. The Reagan Revolution depended on Reagan's affable and likeable personality to reassure Democrats to cross party lines and vote against their own best interests. All based on emotion. The best candidates depend on simple memes to bring along voters who might not have the time or ability to "do the research". For these people Obama had three messages: Hope, Change, and a Tax Cut for those making less than $250k. It's a simple and brilliant strategy because this tripod insulated Obama from many attacks. It trumped Ayers, White, Joe the Scab(plumber), and "Guns & God".

Where I think you are generalizing is in your thinking that most Obama voters chose based purely on emotional standards. The real reason for his large grassroots support was as simple as Bush's approval rating and the job he's done the last 8 years. As the saying goes from 1992 "It's the economy stupid". The worse the economy got, the more people were willing to listen to alternative ideas. I know so many Republicans who voted Democrat for the first time in their lives not based necessarily on their love or emotional bond to Obama, but on the knowledge that they could not stomach what the GOP had become and how much it had lost it's way. Exclusionary; Racist; Imperial Executive; Ignoring the Bill of Rights; Spending like a Drunken Sailor; Scandals; TORTURE. All of these newly adopted GOP policies under Bush were anathema to what the GOP used to stand for. A lot of Republicans pulled the lever for Obama holding their nose. Those swing voters, and an energized Democratic base was how Obama won. People looked at their pocketbooks, and realized they would rather try something new, send the pendulum in a new direction, than continue the policies that got us to the brink.

That too may be an emotional decision, but it's one based on the principle of survival. It was a gut check. Stick with the horse, on fire, foaming at the mouth, running over a cliff...or choose rationally to take a chance on a new horse going in another direction.

We've had 28 years of deregulation and corporate greed. 28 years of privitizing profits and socializing losses. Socialism for the rich if you will. At some point, the collective will of our remaining middle class was going to look around and decide to swat the ruling cadre. The only question left is if the zeitgeist will remember how bad it is today in 2/4/8 years, or if this is just a minor hiccup on our march towards corporate oligarchy?

necrodancer said...

C Mac, The mere fact that anyone would go completely contrary to their political conscience to vote for a candidate completely supports my theories. Emotion, feel good politics. Look, Barack Obama might be able to make good on some of his promises. I doubt we'll see a middle class tax cut. I remember something else from the 1992 campaign, it coincided with the "It's the economy stupid" statement. Mr. Bill Clinton promised a middle class tax cut, too. Just a few months after his inauguration, he admitted there was no possible way to make good on that promise.

With all the promises we've heard over the past year, how the middle class tax cut survived scrutiny, I will never know.

I know you. I know you didn't vote for Mr. Obama blindly. I know too that most people aren't nearly as intelligent as you. Most people do not make nearly the effort you do or care nearly as much as you do about politics. I also know there were a ton who voted based merely on what the commercials showed them. Seriously, they based their vote on the feel good brand.

I didn't like John McCain. Although he is registered republican, he is far more like the bluedog democrats than he will ever be like a republican. If he would have managed his campaign truer to that which is his real life, he might have had a better chance to pull it off. But given the choice between a Democrat and a pretend Democrat, I still think the country would have chosen the true Dem - even without his Feel Good Branding.